All Posts

A few weeks ago, a small green-cheeked conure nearly died on a busy traffic intersection. My brother-in-law spotted her just in time, stepping in as a bike and a rickshaw were about to end what was probably an already disorienting journey for a bird that had clearly flown far from wherever she belonged. My niece took her in. And what happened next is what I keep thinking about. Within days, this bird, who I assumed would be quiet and cautious, had decided my niece was her flo

Lately, I’ve been getting invites from creators I follow on Instagram to join communities. Not follow, not subscribe, but to join. Photo by Seth Doyle on Unsplash WhatsApp has shifted from groups to communities. Reddit, Discord, and Slack, places where real conversations happen. But in Employer Branding ? Somewhere along the way, communities became an afterthought instead of the mainstay. And yet, community is not new to talent attraction. What’s missing is intention. Creatin

If you’re building your Employer Brand from the ground up, it’s tempting to jump on to campaigns, hashtags, or career site redesigns. But before you create anything, pause and ask these 5 Employer Brand Diagnostic questions first: 1️⃣ Why would someone choose to work and stay? Go beyond perks. What emotion would you like to evoke, to join your mission? Consider what makes your work meaningful or impactful, what differentiates your employee experience from competitors, and how

Your Employer Brand is not only your Employer Reputation . One is what you intentionally build. The other is what the world says about you. Too many companies treat employer branding like damage control, only reacting to Glassdoor reviews and scrambling to manage the social/online narratives. But a strong employer brand is proactive. It’s rooted in your values, lived by your people, and communicated clearly at every touchpoint. Don’t wait for reputation to shape your brand. S

When Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta go to market for tech hires, they’re not just selling jobs. They are selling an experience of impact, one that engineers can picture themselves building. Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash Here’s the snapshot: Amazon leans on leadership principles, scale, and customer obsession. The hook: ownership at a massive scale. Google wraps mission-driven work in world-class perks, engineering excellence, and a visible learning culture

Here's what you need instead... "Culture fit" used to sound like a good thing. Photo by Tim Marshall on Unsplash Until we realised… It often means hiring people who think, work, and decide in the exact same way. That’s not culture... It’s comfort. And comfort kills innovation. What we need instead are Culture Builders. People who bring cognitive diversity...that's different ways of thinking, problem-solving, and approaching challenges. People who make the team sharper, more

That little bit of workplace banter has followed me around for years. Friends and colleagues have always made the Heinz Ketchup connection with my name. (Psst...honestly, a big brand reference is always fun when it’s sort of tied to your identity 😊). So when I heard about Heinz Ketchup Smoothie, of course I had to find out more. 📣 If tomatoes are a fruit, is ketchup just… a smoothie? They’ve taken a viral internet joke and turned it into reality... blending ketchup with aca

Employer branding isn’t about being liked by everyone. It's about being irresistible to the right one. One of the biggest mistakes companies make is trying to appeal to all job seekers (the foremost goal is to identify who they are). The result of trying to be all-for-all... a watered-down message that excites no one. Strong brands do something different: 🔹They speak directly to the people whose skills, values, and aspirations match what the company truly offers. 🔹And ye

As businesses continue to evaluate, “Do techies care more about salary or culture?” So, I decided to do some stealth stalking of community conversations to hear about what's on their mind. Photo by Tobias Rademacher on Unsplash Based on snippets I’ve seen on Reddit, Discord, Quora, Blind, and overheard in most coffee chats with engineers: Compensation is the entry ticket. Without it, you’re not even in the game. Culture is the deal-breaker. And the balance shifts depending o

For over a decade, getting into FAANG (Meta/Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google) was the tech world’s version of "You've made it.” (Check out my previous post on what these companies get right when attracting tech talent – link in comments). But the narrative is shifting. Layoffs have shaken the perception of job security. Stories on Reddit, Blind, and Quora highlight burnout and long hours. Engineers are asking, “Is the brand worth the trade-off?” Here’s what I’m s

Photo by Red Zeppelin on Unsplash You don’t launch once and forget. You release. You update. You patch bugs. You evolve with user feedback. The brands winning talent today aren’t static…they are agile. But here’s the real debate: 👉 Should your EVP be treated as a fixed north star (stable, long-term, unchanging)? Or 👉 As a flexible framework (evolving, responsive, adapting to talent and business shifts)? There is no one-size-fits-all. Some stability gives clarity. Too much r

While organisations are pivoting to skills hiring, to an extent, the newer generations, Millennials and Gen Z, feel that the career ladder is outdated. Photo by Ashley Levinson on Unsplash Why? Because: A “Manager” in one company is a “Specialist” in another. Title inflation doesn’t impress, but real skills do. Skills are portable currency, and they can be taken anywhere. But, in most locations, experienced talent still cares about titles. They bring recognition, show growth,

According to Forbes, 90% of companies that shifted from degree-based hiring to skills-based hiring report fewer hiring mistakes, and 94% say skills-based hires outperform those chosen via credentials or experience alone." Photo by Lauren Griffiths on Unsplash For organizational leadership this means… 🔺Broader, richer talent pools open up when you assess candidates by skill, not just title or alma mater. (Propeller) 🔺Diversity and inclusion improve: 84% say skills-based hiri

Turns out my Gen Alpha niece understands branding better than I thought. Photo by Melissa Askew on Unsplash Last week my teen niece casually paused at one of my slides and said, “Hmm… the vibe is off.” I laughed, but it stuck with me. Kids don’t talk about positioning or EVP statements; they just feel whether something fits (btw, she is a fan of Katseye Gap ad vs Sidney sweeney one, apparently, it is ‘vibin’ with all the diversity in the group!) That led me down a rabbit hol

Throughout my career in Employer Branding, I've kept hearing a similar question in leadership circles in different ways... “Do we really need a big budget, or is this investment really necessary now in employer branding?” Photo by Dännavan Fulton on Unsplash The short answer is a resounding yes! But not for the reasons you might think. Here’s what really matters: 1. Employer Brand is not your marketing slogan. It’s the reputation of your workplace in the talent market, built

If you scan the headlines, one pattern stands out: we’ve moved from AI experiments to AI at the core of business. Reliance is setting up a dedicated AI unit, Google is rolling out AI Search in Hindi and beyond, and HubSpot just built AI into how marketers engage customers. Photo by Walls.io on unsplash But AI isn’t the only story. A few signals worth noting: 🔹 Budgets are shifting from vanity metrics to revenue-linked KPIs like retention and lifetime value. 🔹 Premiumisation

You’ve heard about cognitive dissonance. But have you heard about Creative Dissonance? Image source: Telstra Marketing Post It’s when a brand intentionally disrupts its own patterns, its tone, visuals, voice, or messaging to grab attention, reset perceptions, or connect with a new audience. Think of it as “planned inconsistency”. It jolts people out of autopilot, making them notice and re-evaluate the brand. It comes from the idea of cognitive dissonance in psychology (the d

Photo by Hugh Han on Unsplash According to Indeed, job seekers only dedicate an average of 14.6 seconds to reading the requirements or qualifications section of a job description. 49% of job seekers agreed that most job application processes are too long and complicated, which leads to skimming applications. Job posts under 300 words received 8.4% more responses. So, candidates do read them, and most often on mobiles. They skim for 3 things: role clarity, growth, and culture